|
|
|
|
The Washington Times Prints AHI LetterWashington, DC- On November 27, 2005, The Washington Times published AHI Executive Director Nick Larigakis’ letter to the editor, on page B2, responding to Osman Ertug’s article “Narrowing the split in Cyprus.” The text of the letter appears below, followed by The Washington Times article to which the letter responds. November 17, 2005 Letters to the Editor Dear Editor: Readers of The Washington Times are well advised to separate fact from fiction after reading the November 9th letter from Mr. Osman Ertug on the recent visit to the United States by Turkish Cypriot leader Mehmet Ali Talat, at the invitation of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, and other moves which your correspondent in Andrew Borowiec had presented – very wisely – as moves that “widen the split” in Cyprus. First, Mr. Ertug rewrites history as easily as he misrepresents it. First, by addressing Mr. Talat as the “Turkish Cypriot President” and, secondly, by choosing to forget that Turkey is the one which perpetuates the division in Cyprus by occupying over one third of this sovereign country’s territory for the past 31 years. Mr Talat is not the “President” of any country since the rump state he heads is recognized only by Turkey. And his presence here or anywhere in the world will NOT remove or ease the so-called “isolation of the Turkish Cypriots”. The economic isolation of the Turkish Cypriots is caused by Turkey’s 40,000 plus armed occupation forces and the infamous Turkish barbed-wire fence-the Green Line. Mr. Ertug knows very well that Mr. Talat is not authorized and cannot take any decision on the core issues of the Cyprus problem since the breakaway “state” he represents was best described by the European Court of Human Rights as a “subordinate local administration” of Turkey. It is the withdrawal of the over 40,000 Turkish troops and the over 100,000 thousand illegal Turkish settlers from Cyprus that will help improve prospects for a settlement. Finally, it is in Turkey’s interests to quickly move to recognize the Republic of Cyprus, a full-fledged European Union member. This will go a long way to helping achieve a settlement as well as facilitate Ankara’s aspirations to join the European Union family. Sincerely,
Nick Larigakis Washington Times, The (DC) One should not forget that one
of the principal arguments that the Greek-Cypriot side advanced for
rejecting the Annan plan was that it would have to shoulder the economic
burden of unification because the Turkish-Cypriots were the poorer
community. OSMAN ERTUG |
|